<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<atom:link href="http://www.manganese.org/source/rss/imni_news/_nocache" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<channel>

<title>FLBA - NEWS</title>

<link>http://www.flba.co.uk</link>
<description>Latest News</description>

<language>en-uk</language>

<copyright>Copyright 2009 FLBA</copyright>

<item>
<title>Landmark Chambers is to host a seminar about the Leveson Inquiries</title>
<link>http://www.publicinquiries.org/news/landmark_chambers_is_to_host_a_seminar_about_the_leveson_inquiries</link>
<description> Landmark Chambers is to host a seminar about the Leveson Inquiries – entitled Phone hacking Inquiries and how to protect a free press – on 8 September 201</description>
<pubDate>11 Aug 2011</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>4/8/11 - Victims and NGOs withdraw from Torture Inquiry</title>
<link>http://www.publicinquiries.org/news/4811_-_victims_and_ngos_withdraw_from_torture_inquiry</link>
<description> Many NGOs and those who claim they have been tortured will take no part in the Torture Inquiry because they believe it lacks credibility and transparency</description>
<pubDate>05 Aug 2011</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>28/7/11 - Lord Justice Leveson sets out inquiry into press ethics</title>
<link>http://www.publicinquiries.org/news/28711_-_lord_justice_leveson_sets_out_inquiry_into_press_ethics</link>
<description> Lord Justice Leveson today provided an overview of the first part of his inquiry into phone hacking</description>
<pubDate>05 Aug 2011</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Supreme Court hands down judgment on historical application of the procedural element of Article 2</title>
<link>http://www.publicinquiries.org/news/supreme_court_hand_down_judgment_on_historical_application_of_the_procedural_element_of_article_2</link>
<description> The Supreme Court today handed down a judgment on the State's procedural obligation under Article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights. From now any investigations commencing into deaths that occurred prior to the coming into force of the Human Rights Act 1998 (2nd October 2000) where there is an allegation that an agent of the state was involved will need to be compliant with Article 2</description>
<pubDate>20 May 2011</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Robert Hamill Inquiry report able to be published</title>
<link>http://www.publicinquiries.org/news/robert_hamill_inquiry_report_able_to_be_published</link>
<description> </description>
<pubDate>29 Mar 2011</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Rosemary Nelson Inquiry report checked</title>
<link>http://www.publicinquiries.org/news/-_rosemary_nelson_inquiry_report_checked</link>
<description> </description>
<pubDate>29 Mar 2011</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Robert Hamill Inquiry report publication</title>
<link>http://www.publicinquiries.org/news/robert_hamill_inquiry_report_publication</link>
<description> The Secretary of State for Northern Ireland informed the House that he has decided not to publish the Inquiry's report because it would prejudice the prosecutions that arose from the Inquiry's interim report. He intends to publish the report as soon as the proceedings conclude</description>
<pubDate>02 Feb 2011</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>The Iraq Inquiry today restarted its oral hearings</title>
<link>http://www.publicinquiries.org/news/the_iraq_inquiry_today_restarted_its_oral_hearings</link>
<description> </description>
<pubDate>28 Jan 2011</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>The Al-Sweady Inquiry held a hearing was held regarding the undertaking</title>
<link>http://www.publicinquiries.org/news/the_al-sweady_inquiry_held_a_hearing_was_held_regarding_the_undertaking</link>
<description> </description>
<pubDate>28 Jan 2011</pubDate>
</item><item>
<title>Update on the Robert Hamill Inquiry</title>
<link>http://www.publicinquiries.org/news/update_on_the_robert_hamill_inquiry</link>
<description> The Public Prosecution Service for Northern Ireland today announced that, following an interim report from the Robert Hamill Inquiry, the Test for Prosecution is met in respect of two persons for an offence of conspiracy to pervert the course of public justice and one person for doing an act with intent to pervert the course of public justice.</description>
<pubDate>28 Jan 2011</pubDate>
</item>

</channel></rss>






